Cannabis. Usos y aplicaciones en la práctica odontológica diaria: revisión de la literatura / Cannabis. Uses and applications in daily dental practice: a review of the literature

La evidencia científica presente en la literatura indica que el cannabis puede ser utilizado con fines terapéuticos para tratar distintas afecciones odontológicas. Dado el acceso sencillo a la cavidad bucal, las distintas formulaciones de cannabis pueden aplicarse de forma tópica. La aplicación local de dosis bajas de cannabis ha demostrado alta efectividad para tratar distintas afecciones bucales, constituyendo un tratamiento seguro con baja probabilidad de generar repercusiones sistémicas indeseadas. En la actualidad, está siendo incorporado a materiales convencionales de uso e higiene odontológica con la finalidad de aprovechar sus efectos terapéuticos. El cannabis tiene múltiples usos en odontología: como componen-te de enjuagues bucales y soluciones para la desinfección de conductos radiculares, en tratamientos de trastornos de ansiedad bucal, como complemento en terapias oncológicas, como analgésico para atenuar el dolor inflamatorio y el neuropático, como miorrelajante y condroprotector para tratar trastornos de articulación témporomandibular (ATM) y bruxismo, como osteomodulador para el tratamiento de patologías que comprometen la integridad ósea, como la enfermedad periodontal y la osteoporosis, y para la cicatrización ósea asociada a fracturas, extracciones dentarias e implantes, y como inmunomodulador con potencial terapéutico para tratar patologías autoinmunes como las enfermedades reumáticas. El trata-miento local con cannabis es efectivo, bien tolerado por el paciente y con pocos efectos adversos. Por lo tanto, se puede concluir que el cannabis aporta un enorme abanico de posibilidades terapéuticas para tratar distintas afecciones odontológicas, aunque aún se requiere mayor cantidad de estudios científicos que avalen su utilización en cada situación fisiopatológica particular (AU)

The scientific evidence present in the literature indicates that cannabis can be used for therapeutic purposes to treat different dental conditions. Given the easy access to the oral cavity, the different cannabis formulations can be applied topically. The local application of low doses of cannabis has shown high effectiveness in treating different oral conditions, constituting a safe treatment with a low probability of generating unwanted systemic repercussions. It is currently being incorporated into conventional materials for dental use and hygiene in order to take advantage of its therapeutic effects. Cannabis has multiple uses in dentistry: as a component of mouthwashes and solutions for disinfecting root canals, in the treatment of oral anxiety disorders, as a complement in oncological therapies, as an analgesic to reduce inflammatory and neuropathic pain, as a muscle relaxant and chondroprotective to treat temporomandibular joint disorders and bruxism, as an osteomodulator for the treatment of pathologies that compromise bone integrity, such as periodontal disease and osteoporosis, and or bone healing associated with fractures, dental extractions and implants, and as immunomodulator with therapeutic potential to treat autoimmune pathologies such as rheumatic diseases. Local treatment with cannabis is effective, well tolerated by the patient and with few adverse effects. Local treatment with cannabis is effective, well tolerated by the patient and with few adverse effects. Therefore, it can be concluded that cannabis provides an enormous range of therapeutic possibilities to treat different dental conditions, although more scientific studies are still required to support its use in each particular pathophysiological situation (AU)

Trigeminal neuralgia after corneal transplantation - a case report / Neuralgia do trigêmeo pós-transplante de córnea - relato de caso

ABSTRACT Description of a patient with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy submitted to a corneal transplant, performed by Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty, which evolved with sudden, paroxysmal pain in the frontotemporal region, postoperatively. Due to the ophthalmologic picture of the patient, the attending physician believed in possible rejection of the graft, neglecting the complaint of pain. Even after a successful second transplant, performed due to primary failure, disabling pain persisted and the physician did not manage it. After years of investigation, consulting with several specialists, it was concluded the patient presented trigeminal neuralgia that had not been treated since the surgical procedure. In addition, it led to several psychosocial consequences. Therefore, it is essential to be aware trigeminal neuralgia is a possible outcome of corneal transplantation, and its symptoms should not be neglected by the attending physician, thus contributing to better management for transplanted patients.

RESUMO Descrição do relato de caso de uma paciente com distrofia endotelial de Fuchs submetida a transplante de córnea, realizado pela técnica DMEK, que evoluiu com quadro de dor súbita, paroxística, em região frontotemporal, no pós-operatório. Devido ao quadro oftalmológico da paciente, o médico assistente acreditava em possível rejeição do enxerto, negligenciando a dor. Mesmo após sucesso do segundo transplante, realizado devido à falência primária, as dores incapacitantes persistiam, e nenhuma conduta, por parte do médico, foi realizada. Após anos de investigação, mediante consultas com diversos especialistas, concluiu-se que a paciente apresentava um quadro de neuralgia do nervo trigêmeo que não tinha sido tratada desde a realização do procedimento cirúrgico. Além disso, apresentava uma série de consequências psicossociais. Portanto, torna-se imprescindível entender que a neuralgia do nervo trigêmeo é um possível desfecho do transplante de córnea, e seus sintomas não devem ser negligenciados por parte do médico assistente, contribuindo para melhores condutas para os pacientes transplantados.

Neuralgia del Trigémino / Trigeminal neuralgia

Resumen La neuralgia del trigémino (NT) es una enfermedad cuya prevalencia es alta y corresponde a un porcentaje importante de neuralgias faciales; en donde las personas más afectadas son mayores de 50 años. Su manifestación clínica suele ser de cuadros de dolor facial severo y recurrentes, unilateral; en la distribución de una o más divisiones del nervio trigémino y no se explica con otro diagnóstico. El diagnóstico se basa en el cuadro clínico y usualmente no se encuentra déficit sensorial, sin embargo, si está presente se deben hacer neuroimágenes para descartar otras causas. En primera instancia está el manejo farmacológico. La carbamazepina se ha establecido como efectivo, llegando a producir un alivio del dolor dentro de las 24 horas. Cuando la farmacoterapia falla, se opta por la cirugía que se divide generalmente en dos: técnicas que destruyen la porción sensitiva del nervio; y la descompresión microvascular (DMV), que es la que tiene mejores resultados.

Abstract Trigeminal neuralgia is a disease whose prevalence is high and corresponds to a significant percentage of facial neuralgia; where the most affected people are over 50 years old. The clinical picture is usually of episodes of severe and recurring facial pain, unilateral; in the distribution of one or more divisions of the trigeminal nerve and this is not explained with another diagnosis. Diagnosis is based on the clinic and usually no sensory deficit is found, however, if present, neuroimaging should be done to rule out other causes. In the first instance is the pharmacological management. Carbamazepine has been established as effective, leading to pain relief within 24 hours. When pharmacological therapy fails, surgery is generally divided into two: techniques that destroy the sensitive portion of the nerve and microvascular decompression, which has the best results.

El uso de toxina botulínica en el tratamiento de la neuralgia del trigémino (V par craneal) / The Use of Botulinum Toxin in the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia (Fifth Cranial Nerve)

ABSTRACT The Trigeminal Neuralgia (TN) is described as neuropathic pain at the orofacial level, characterized by unbearable pain that can last from a few seconds to several minutes. The different treatments used for these patients are to numb the nerve, surgical, pharmacological, and the administration at extra and intraoral level of botulinum toxin, which is a neurotoxin produced in cultures of the bacterium Clostridium botulinum in a natural way; in the sporulation process are 7 subtypes being the subtype A the most used in neurological problems. The botulinum toxin acts as a neuromuscular blocker, by inhibiting the release of acetylcholine at the synaptic space, which is an important neurotransmitter to produce local muscle relaxation, and the patients report reductions in the frequency and intensity of pain with minimal side effects. The injection of botulinum toxin produces an effective pain reduction of neuropathic origin in the hyperalgesic tissue and is used as adjuvant therapy when oral medications do not give adequate control of pain. Over time it is expected to reduce the drugs as the patient tells that the pain has decreased or is being controlled. Patients are indicated the variation of time in which they can obtain relief of their pain. In patients with uncontrolled pain of the trigeminal nerve, the toxin is placed extraoral in the orofacial region with high effectiveness, but there is a lack of studies on the administration in the intraoral submucosal.

RESUMEN La Neuralgia del Trigémino (NT) se describe como un dolor neuropático a nivel orofacial, caracterizado por un dolor insoportable y que puede durar de pocos segundos a varios minutos. Los diferentes tratamientos utilizados para estos pacientes son insensibilizar el nervio, quirúrgico, farmacológico y la administración de toxina botulínica a nivel extra e intraoral, que es una neurotoxina producida en cultivos de la bacteria Clostridium botulinum de manera natural; en el proceso de esporulación se encuentran 7 subtipos siendo el subtipo A el más empleado en problemas neurológicos. Este trabajo se realiza para mantener informada a los profesionales en salud, en especial a los de odontología, sobre los avances de la aplicación de la toxina botulínica, como una alternativa acertada en los pacientes con NT. La toxina botulínica funciona como bloqueador neuromuscular, inhibiendo la liberación de la acetilcolina al espacio sináptico, que es un importante neurotransmisor para producir relajación muscular local, y los pacientes informan de reducciones en la frecuencia e intensidad del dolor con mínimos efectos secundarios. La inyección de toxina botulínica produce una eficaz reducción del dolor de origen neuropático en el tejido hiperalgésico y se usa como terapia adyuvante principalmente cuando los medicamentos orales no dan el adecuado control del dolor. Con el tiempo se espera ir reduciendo los fármacos a medida que el paciente refiera que el dolor ha disminuido o se encuentra controlado. A los pacientes se les indica la variación de tiempo en que pueden obtener alivio de su dolor. En pacientes con dolor no controlado del nervio trigémino, la toxina botulínica se coloca de forma extraoral en la región orofacial, con alta efectividad, pero faltan estudios sobre la administración en la submucosa intraoral.

NLRP3 inflammasome signaling as an early molecular response is negatively controlled by miR-186 in CFA-induced prosopalgia mice

The NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome is the most frequently studied in the central nervous system and has been linked to neuropathic pain. In this study, a post-translational mechanism of microRNA (miR)-186 via regulating the expression of NLRP3 in the complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA)-treated mice was investigated. The injection of CFA was used to induce trigeminal neuropathic pain in mice. miRs microarray chip assay was performed in trigeminal ganglions (TGs). CFA treatment significantly increased the mRNA expression of NLRP3, interleukin (IL)-1β, and IL-18 in TGs compared to the control group. Moreover, 26 miRs were differentially expressed in TGs from trigeminal neuropathic pain mice, and the expression of miR-186 showed the lowest level of all the miRs. Further examination revealed that NLRP3 was a candidate target gene of miR-186. We delivered miR-186 mimics to CFA-treated mice. The head withdrawal thresholds of the CFA-treated mice were significantly increased by miR-186 mimics injection compared with CFA single treatment. The mRNA and protein expression of NLRP3, IL-1β, and IL-18 in TGs from trigeminal neuropathic pain mice were significantly inhibited by miR-186 mimics treatment compared to the CFA group. miR-186 was able to suppress the neuropathic pain via regulating the NLRP3 inflammasome signaling.

Botulinum neurotoxin type-A when utilized in animals with trigeminal sensitization induced a antinociceptive effect / Neurotoxina botulínica do tipo-A quando utilizada em animais com sensibilização trigeminal induz efeito antinociceptivo

ABSTRACT Purpose of the study was evaluate the possible antinociceptive effect of botulinum neurotoxin type-A (BoNT/A) in an experimental model of trigeminal neuralgia. Method Neuropathic pain was induced by surgical constriction of the infraorbital nerve in rats. A control group underwent a sham procedure consisting of surgical exposure of the nerve. Subgroups of each group received either BoNT/A or isotonic saline solution. The clinical response was assessed with the -20°C test. Animals that underwent nerve constriction developed sensitization; the sham group did not. Results The sensitization was reversed by BoNT/A treatment evident 24 hours following application. Pronociceptive effect was observed in the sham group following BoNT/A. Conclusion BoNT/A has an antinociceptive effect in sensitized animals and a pronociceptive effect in non-sensitized animals.

RESUMO A proposta do estudo foi avaliar o efeito antinociceptivo da neurotoxina botulínica do tipo A (BoNT/A) em um modelo experimental de nevralgia trigeminal. Método O grupo estudo foi obtido através da constrição do nervo infraorbital em ratos e o grupo controle pela simples exposição deste nervo. Cada um dos grupos foram subdivididos de acordo com o tratamento realizado após a intervenção cirurgica: solução salina isotônica ou BoNT/A. A resposta terapêutica foi avaliada através do teste de -20°C. Resultados Animais com constrição do nervo desenvolveram uma sensibilização nociceptiva quando comparados ao grupo controle. Ela foi revertida após 24 horas utilizando BoNT/A. O efeito pronociceptivo foi observado no grupo controle após a administração de BoNTA. Conclusão BoNT/A apresenta um efeito antinociceptivo em animais sensibilizados e pronociceptivo em animals não sensibilizados.

OnabotulinumtoxinA for trigeminal neuralgia: a review of the available data / Toxina Onabotulínica-A para neuralgia do trigêmeo: uma revisão dos dados disponíveis

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) patients may develop side effects from centrally acting drugs, have contraindications for neurosurgical procedures, or experience relapse during conventional therapies. OnabotulinumtoxinA (BoNT/A) has been reported to be effective for TN, although this finding has been challenged. An overview of the available evidence based on a narrative/qualitative analysis of the literature is presented. About 90% of patients who receive BoNT/A show an improvement, a higher figure than that reported for the placebo effect of BoNT/A for other headaches. Tolerability of BoNT/A is good, and its few side-effects are transient. The articles reviewed were mainly case reports, case series and open-label trials; however, randomized controlled trials have endorsed the efficacy of BoNT/A for TN. This evidence, together with a better understanding of the analgesic mechanisms of BoNT/A and its proven efficacy in treating other pain syndromes, supports the use of this toxin as a therapeutic option for TN.

Pacientes com neuralgia do trigêmeo (NT) podem apresentar efeitos colaterais decorrentes do uso de drogas psicoativas, contra-indicações a procedimentos neurocirúrgicos ou perda da eficácia destas terapias. A neurotoxina botulínica do tipo A (NTB/A) tem demonstrado ser eficaz no alívio da NT, ainda que este achado tenha sido contestado. Uma análise narrativa/qualitativa da literatura disponível é apresentada. Cerca de 90% dos pacientes que receberam NTB/A melhoram, um número superior aos atribuíveis ao efeito placebo da NTB/A em outras cefaléias. Além disso, a NTB/A mostrou uma baixa incidência de efeitos colaterais, transitórios. Embora a maioria dos artigos consistam de relatos de caso, séries de casos e ensaios abertos, ensaios clínicos randomizados controlados recentes reafirmam a eficácia da NTB/A na NT. Estas evidências, associadas ao melhor entendimento dos mecanismos analgésicos da NTB/A e a sua eficácia em outras síndromes dolorosas, ratificam a NTB/A como uma opção terapêutica para a NT.

Combination of pharmacotherapy and lidocaine analgesic block of the peripheral trigeminal branches for trigeminal neuralgia: a pilot study / Combinação de farmacoterapia e bloqueio analgésico com lidocaína sobre os ramos periféricos trigeminais no tratamento da neuralgia do trigêmeo: um estudo piloto

Classical trigeminal neuralgia (CTN) is treated predominantly by pharmacotherapy but side effects and unsuccessful occurs. The current study was carried out to evaluate the therapeutic effect of combination of pharmacotherapy and lidocaine block. Thirteen patients with CTN managed with pharmacotherapy were recruited and assigned either to no additional treatment (Group I) or to additional analgesic block (Group II). The primary endpoint was the reduction in the frequency of pain episodes in a month assessed at 30 and 90 days. Comparisons of measurements of pain, general health and depression scales were secondary endpoints. The results from the follow-up visits at 30 and 90 days showed the Group II to have larger reduction in the frequency of pain and exhibited a bigger improvement in the scores of the pain, general health and depression scales. The results from this preliminary study suggest a clinical benefit of the combination of pharmacotherapy and lidocaine block.

A neuralgia clássica do trigêmio (NTC) é tratada predominantemente por drogas, porém efeitos colaterais e falhas terapêuticas ocorrem. Avaliamos o efeito terapêutico da combinação entre farmacoterapia e bloqueio analgésico utilizando a lidocaína. Treze pacientes portadores de NTC tratados com farmacoterapia foram divididos em dois grupos: Grupo I pacientes que mantiveram somente tratamento medicamentos e Grupo II pacientes que associaram bloqueio anestésico. O objetivo primário do estudo foi à redução da freqüência da dor 30 e 90 dias após o bloqueio. Secundariamente avaliamos o impacto sobre as escalas de depressão, dor e qualidade de vida. O grupo II teve uma redução significativa na freqüência da dor e uma melhora nos escores de qualidade de vida, dor e escala de depressão. Os resultados sugerem um benefício clinico da combinação de farmacoterapia e bloqueio anestésico no tratamento da NTC.

Effect of carbamazepine and gabapentin on excitability in the trigeminal subnucleus caudalis of neonatal rats using a voltage-sensitive dye imaging technique

BACKGROUND: The antiepileptic drugs carbamazepine and gabapentin are effective in treating neuropathic pain and trigeminal neuralgia. In the present study, to analyze the effects of carbamazepine and gabapentin on neuronal excitation in the spinal trigeminal subnucleus caudalis (Sp5c) in the medulla oblongata, we recorded temporal changes in nociceptive afferent activity in the Sp5c of trigeminal nerve-attached brainstem slices of neonatal rats using a voltage-sensitive dye imaging technique. RESULTS: Electrical stimulation of the trigeminal nerve rootlet evoked changes in the fluorescence intensity of dye in the Sp5c. The optical signals were composed of two phases, a fast component with a sharp peak followed by a long-lasting component with a period of more than 500 ms. This evoked excitation was not influenced by administration of carbamazepine (10, 100 and 1,000 µM) or gabapentin (1 and 10 µM), but was increased by administration of 100 µM gabapentin. This evoked excitation was increased further in low Mg²+ (0.8 mM) conditions, and this effect of low Mg²+ concentration was antagonized by 30 µM DL-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (AP5), a N-methyl-D-as-partate (NMDA) receptor blocker. The increased excitation in low Mg²+ conditions was also antagonized by carbamazepine (1,000 µM) and gabapentin (100 µM). CONCLUSION: Carbamazepine and gabapentin did not decrease electrically evoked excitation in the Sp5c in control conditions. Further excitation in low Mg²+ conditions was antagonized by the NMDA receptor blocker AP5. Carbamazepine and gabapentin had similar effects to AP5 on evoked excitation in the Sp5c in low Mg²+ conditions. Thus, we concluded that carbamazepine and gabapentin may act by blocking NMDA receptors in the Sp5c, which contributes to its anti-hypersensitivity in neuropathic pain.

Nevralgia do trigêmeo associada à hanseníase / Hanseniase associated Trigeminal Nevralgia

A hanseníase é uma doença infecto-contagiosa, que além de alterações dermatológicas, possui manifestações neurológicas. Relatamos o caso de um homem de 66 anos, que apresentou nevralgia do trigêmeo após ter apresentado quadro de hanseníase.

Hansen's disease is an infectious disease that presents with skin changes, as well as neurological features. We report a case of a 66 years man, who presented with trigeminal neuralgia after developing Hansen's disease.

Recomendaciones para el tratamiento del dolor neuropático / Recommendations for the treatment of neuropathic pain

Con la introducción y el desarrollo de nuevos productos que han demostrado ser eficaces en el dolor neuropático (DN), se ha generado una clara necesidad de tener un algoritmo basado en la evidencia para tratar las diferentes condiciones del DN. El objetivo de este artículo es elaborar unas recomendaciones para el tratamiento del DN que estén avaladas por la evidencia científica y que estén consensuadas por un grupo multidisciplinario de expertos en metodología y en tratamiento del dolor. La evidencia se ha obtenido de estudios de metanálisis que recogen la mayor información disponible para cada tipo de DN. La búsqueda bibliográfica se llevó a cabo por 5 revisores, que se centraron individualmente en las diferentes formas de presentación del DN. Las bases de datos consultadas fueron la Cochrane Library, EMBASE (año 2000 en adelante) y PUBMED(año 2000 en adelante), y se seleccionaron metaanálisis y ensayos clínicos aleatorizados y controlados. Finalmente, los autores, especialistas en dolor, evaluaron e hicieron las recomendaciones clínicas para el tratamiento del DN. En algunos tipos de DN, de los cuales no hay suficiente información, se han incluido recomendaciones basadas en publicaciones científicas sin evidencia, con el objetivo de que estas recomendaciones proporcionen la mayor información posible acerca de su tratamiento. Se han revisado estudios de eficacia y seguridad de neuralgia postherpética (NPH), neuropatía diabética dolorosa (NDD) y neuralgia del trigémino(NT) como paradigmas de DN periférico, y también se ha recogido la escasa información existente acerca del DN central(DNC) y el dolor simpático (DS). Con los resultados obtenidos con este estudio bibliográfico y las evidencias extraídas, se ha elaborado un algoritmo de decisión con los fármacos disponibles actualmente en la farmacopea española para la NPH y la NDD; por otro lado, y de forma independiente, para la NT y, finalmente, para el DNC y el DS.

The introduction and development of new products with demonstrated efficacy in neuropathic pain has generated a clear need for an evidence-based algorithm to treat the different types of neuropathic pain. The present article aims to provide recommendations on the treatment of neuropathic pain supported by the scientific evidence and agreed on by consensus by a multidisciplinary group of experts in methodology and pain management. The evidence was obtained from meta-analyses including the greatest amount of information available for each type of neuropathic pain. The literature search was performed by 5 reviewers, who focussed individually on the distinct forms of presentation of neuropathic pain. The databases consulted were the Cochrane Library, EMBASE (from 2000 onwards), and PUBMED (from 2000 onwards). Meta-analyses and randomized, controlled clinical trials were selected. Finally, retrieved articles were evaluated and clinical recommendations for the treatment of neuropathic pain were designed by the pain specialists. For some types of neuropathic pain, there is insufficient information. In these types of pain, recommendations based on scientific publications without evidence were included to provide the reatest possible amount of information on their treatment. Studies of safety and efficacy in postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN), and trigeminal neuralgia (TN) were reviewed as paradigms of peripheral neuropathic pain. The scarce available information on central neuropathic pain (CNP) and sympathetic pain (SP) was also gathered. Based on the results obtained with this literature review and the evidence extracted, a decision algorithm was designed with the drugs currently available in the Spanish pharmacopeia for PHN and PDN, and separate decision algorithms were designed for TN and finally for CNP and S P.

Neuralgia do trigêmeo bilateral: relato de caso / Neuralgia del trigémino bilateral: relato de caso / Bilateral trigeminal neuralgia: case report

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A neuralgia do nervo trigêmeo é uma condição intensamente dolorosa, caracterizada por surtos de dor lancinante e súbita, tipo choque, com duração de poucos segundos a dois minutos e geralmente unilateral. Sua incidência anual é de cerca de 4,3 em 100.000 na população geral, tendo manifestação bilateral em apenas 3 por cento desses casos. O objetivo deste artigo foi descrever um caso raro de neuralgia do trigêmeo primário bilateral. RELATO DO CASO: Paciente de 61 anos, maranhense, casada, do lar, com antecedente de hipertensão arterial e há seis anos com queixa de dor intensa em V2-V3 à esquerda, com duração de 5 a 10 segundos, em região lateral do nariz e mandibular, com piora ao falar, mastigar e com diminuição da temperatura. Já havia utilizado clorpromazina (3 mg a cada oito horas) e carbamazepina (200 mg a cada oito horas) durante seis meses sem alívio da dor. Ao exame físico apresentava alodinia térmica e mecânica em regiões de V2-V3. Estava em uso de gabapentina (1.200 mg ao dia) com alívio parcial da dor. Foi então aumentada a gabapentina para 1500 mg ao dia e introduzida amitriptilina 12,5 mg à noite. Evoluiu com dor leve e esporádica com diminuição da intensidade da dor ao longo de 10 meses de tratamento, sendo reduzida progressivamente a gabapentina para 600 mg ao dia e mantida a amitriptilina 12,5 mg ao dia. Após um ano, começou a apresentar dor de característica semelhante em região mandibular à direita, tendo melhorado com aumento de gabapentina para 900 mg ao dia. Não apresentava exames alterados de tomografia ou ressonância magnética de encéfalo. CONCLUSÕES: A carbamazepina é o fármaco de primeira escolha para tratamento de neuralgia trigeminal, porém a gabapentina tem sido cada vez mais utilizada como primeira medida farmacológica ou em casos refratários à terapia convencional.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Trigeminal neuralgia is an extremely painful condition characterized by recurrent episodes of sudden, lancinating, shock-like pain lasting from a few seconds to two minutes usually unilateral. It has an annual incidence of approximately 4.3 in 100,000 in the general population and only 3 percent of those cases present bilateral manifestation. The objective of this report was to describe a rare case of bilateral trigeminal neuralgia. CASE REPORT: A 61 years old housewife from Maranhão, Brazil, married, with a history of hypertension, presented with a six-year history of severe pain in the left V2-V3 regions, lasting 5 to 10 seconds, in the lateral aspect of the nose and mandible, worsening by talking, chewing, and with a decrease in temperature. She had been treated with chlorpromazine (3 mg every eight hours) and carbamazepine (200 mg every eight hours) during six months without improvement. On physical exam, the patient presented thermal and mechanical allodynia in the V2-V3 regions. She was using gabapentin (1,200 mg/day) with partial relief of the pain. The dose of gabapentin was increased to 1,500 mg/day and amitriptyline 12.5 mg at night was added to the therapeutic regimen. The patient evolved with mild and sporadical pain and a reduction in pain severity during 10 months; the dose of gabapentin was progressively reduced to 600 mg/day, and amitriptyline was maintained at 12.5 mg/day. After one year, the patient developed similar pain in the region of the right mandible, which improved with an increase in the dose of gabapentin to 900 mg/day. Head CT and MRI did not show any abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: Carbamazepine is the first choice for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia; however, the use of gabapentin as the first pharmacological choice or in cases refractory to conventional therapy has been increasing.

JUSTIFICATIVA Y OBJETIVOS: La neuralgia del nervio trigémino es una condición intensamente dolorosa, caracterizada por brotes de dolor lancinantes y súbitos, del tipo descarga eléctrica, con una duración de pocos segundos a dos minutos y generalmente unilateral. Su incidencia anual es de cerca de 4,3 en 100.000 en la población general, manifestándose bilateralmente en solo un 3 por ciento de esos casos. El objetivo de este artículo fue describir un caso raro de neuralgia del trigémino primario bilateral. RELATO DEL CASO: Paciente de 61 años, del estado brasileño de Maranhão, casada, ama de casa, con antecedentes de hipertensión arterial y hace seis años quejándose de dolor intenso en V2-V3 a la izquierda, con una duración de 5 a 10 segundos en la región lateral de la nariz y la mandíbula, con empeoramiento al hablar, masticar y con una reducción de la temperatura. Ya había utilizado clorpromazina (3 mg a cada ocho horas), y carbamazepina (200 mg a cada ocho horas), durante seis meses sin que se le aliviase el dolor. Cuando se le examinó físicamente, presentaba alodinia térmica y mecánica en regiones de V2-V3. Estaba usando gabapentina (1.200 mg al día), con alivio parcial del dolor. Se le aumentó entonces la gabapentina para 1.500 mg al día y se le introdujo la amitriptilina 12,5 mg por la noche. La paciente desarrolló un ligero y esporádico dolor, con una reducción de su intensidad a lo largo de 10 meses de tratamiento, siendo reducida progresivamente la gabapentina para 600 mg al día y mantenida la amitriptilina 12,5 mg al día. Después de un año, empezó a presentar dolor de características similares en la región mandibular a la derecha, y mejoró con el aumento de la gabapentina para 900 mg al día. No presentaba exámenes de tomografía o resonancia magnética de encéfalo alterados. CONCLUSIONES: La carbamazepina es el fármaco de primera elección para el tratamiento de la neuralgia trigeminal, sin embargo la gabapentina ha sido cada vez ...

Influence of NMDA and non-NMDA antagonists on acute and inflammatory pain in the trigeminal territory: a placebo control study / Influência dos antagonistas dos receptores NMDA e não-NMDA sobre a dor aguda e inflamatória ao nível do território do trigêmeo: um estudo placebo controlado

NMDA and non-NMDA receptors are involved in spinal transmission of nociceptive information in physiological and pathological conditions. Our objective was to study the influence of NMDA and non-NMDA receptor antagonists on pain control in the trigeminal system using a formalin-induced orofacial pain model. Motor performance was also evaluated. Male Rattus norvegicus were pre-treated with topiramate (T) (n=8), memantine (M) (n=8), divalproex (D) (n=8) or isotonic saline solution (ISS) (n=10) intraperitoneally 30 minutes before the formalin test. Formalin 2.5 percent was injected into the right upper lip (V2 branch) and induced two phases: phase I (early or neurogenic) (0-3 min) and phase II (late or inflammatory) (12-30 min). For motor behavior performance we used the open-field test and measured latency to movement onset, locomotion and rearing frequencies, and immobility time. Pre-treatment of animals with M and D only attenuated nociceptive formalin behavior for phase II. T increased locomotion and rearing frequencies and reduced immobility time. Treatment with M increased immobility time and with D reduced locomotion frequency. Our results showed that the NMDA antagonist (M) is more potent than the non-NMDA antagonists (D and T) in the control of pain in the inflammatory phase. The non-NMDA topiramate improved motor performance more than did D and M, probably because T has more anxiolytic properties.

Receptores NMDA e não-NMDA estão envolvidos na transmissão das informações nociceptivas em condições fisiológicas e patológicas. Com o objetivo de estudar a influência dos antagonistas dos receptores NMDA e não-NMDA sobre o controle de dor no sistema trigeminal utilizamos modelo de dor orofacial induzida pela formalina. Testes de desempenho motor foram também avaliados. Ratos machos da espécie Rattus norvegicus foram tratados com topiramato (T) (n=8), memantina (M) (n=8), divalproato de sódio (D) (n=8) ou solução salina isotônica (SSI) (n=10), por via intraperitoneal, 30 minutos antes dos testes com a formalina. Formalina 2.5 por cento foram injetadas na região do lábio superior dos animais (segundo ramo do trigêmeo) induzindo comportamento em duas fases distintas: fase I (precoce ou neurogênica) (0-3 min ) e fase II (tardia ou inflamatória) (12-30 min). Para avaliação da atividade motora utilizou-se o teste do campo aberto mensurando-se a latência para o início dos movimentos, número de casas andadas, freqüência de levantamentos e tempo de imobilidade. Animais pré-tratados com M e D atenuaram a fase inflamatória do teste da formalina. O T aumenta o número de casas andadas, freqüência de levantamentos e reduz o tempo de imobilidade. Nossos resultados mostram que o antagonista NMDA é mais potente do que os antagonistas não-NMDA para o controle da fase inflamatória da dor. O topiramato entretanto aumenta a atividade motora provavelmente porque apresente propriedades ansiolíticas.

Beneficial effects of botulinum toxin type A in trigeminal neuralgia / Beneficio de la toxina botulínica tipo A en neuralgia del trigemino

Botulinum toxin has been thoroughly studied as a potential tool in the treatment of several pain syndromes. Therefore, we assessed the clinical effects of botulinum toxin type A injections in 12 patients with otherwise unresponsive idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia. Patients were infiltrated with 20-50 units of botulinum toxin in trigger zones. Those who presented with mandibular involvement were also infiltrated in the masseter muscle. The patients were assessed on a weekly basis using the Visual Analogic Scale for pain. Ten of our patients reported a significant benefit from botulinum toxin injections, with reduction or even disappearance of pain, and remained pain free for as long as 60 days. Our findings suggest that botulinum toxin may represent a useful therapeutic tool in the management of patients with this entity.

La toxina botulínica ha sido estudiada en forma exhaustiva como una potencial herramienta en el tratamiento de múltiples síndromes dolorosos. Por lo tanto, evaluamos los efectos clínicos de la aplicación de toxina botulínica tipo A en 12 sujetos con neuralgia trigeminal idiopática resistente a manejo farmacológico. Se aplicaron en dichos sujetos entre 20 y 50 unidades de toxina botulínica tipo A en las zonas gatillo. Además se infiltró el músculo masetero en aquellos que presentaban involucro mandibular. Los sujetos fueron evaluados semanalmente con una escala visual análoga para dolor. Diez de los sujetos reportaron un beneficio significativo con el uso de toxina botulínica, con reducción e incluso desaparición del dolor, permaneciendo libres de dolor por un periodo de hasta 60 días. Nuestros hallazgos sugieren que la toxina botulínica puede representar una herramienta terapéutica útil en el manejo de pacientes con esta entidad.

Gabapentin for refractory idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia.

Trigeminal neuralgia is sudden, usually unilateral, severe, stabbing, brief recurrent pain in the distribution area of one or more of the branches of trigeminal nerve. Various pharmacological agents including carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, phenytoin, lamotrigine, baclofen and clonazepam have been tried with variable success rate. Here a case of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia is presented. The patient presented in the emergency room with severe pain in the distribution area of maxillary branch of trigeminal nerve, resistant to conventional pharmacotherapy, managed successfully with gabapentin without untoward side-effects.

role of peripheral neurectomies in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia in modern practice

50 patients were analyzed for indications, advantages and complications of peripheral neurectomies from June 2003 to September 2008 reported to the Department of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar. We selected only those patients who were above 40 years. After neurectomies, 35 [70% of patients had excellent pain relie lasting 2-5 years without any medication; 4 [8%] patients experienced occasional pain but no medication required; in 5 [10%] patients pain controlled with medication where as in 6[12%] patients, recurrence of pain appeared in 0-2 years which could not be controlled with medication. These patients were referred to neurosurgeon for MVD [Microvascular Decompression]. Both surgical and medical therapies are effective for trigeminal neuralgia. However, factors such as pain relief, recurrence mates and morbidity and mortality rates should be taken into account when considering which technique to use. It seems proper to start a patient suffering from trigeminal neuralgia with medical therapy but proceed early with surgical treatment if pain control is poor or side effects of medication are intolerable. The loss of sensation along the branch of the trigeminal nerve and recurrence rate are associated with peripheral neurectomy. But it is an effective and safe procedure for elderly patients; particularly those who have short life span. And in centers where facilities are not available for major neurosurgical procedures or patient is not fit for such procedures, neurectomy is-the best choice. It is possible even under local anesthesia

Treatment of trigeminal neuralgia with low doses of topiramate

Topiramate was administered to eight patients with classical trigeminal neuralgia with or without previous symptomatic therapy with other antiepileptic drugs. The topiramate doses ranged from 50 to 100 mg a day, according to the clinical response and the reported side effects. Three patients had complete symptoms remission, three reported moderate improvement, and the treatment was not effective in two. The most frequently registered side effects were dizziness, somnolence and weight loss. Topiramate can be considered an alternative treatment for patients with trigeminal neuralgia.

Oito pacientes com neuralgia do trigêmeo, com ou sem tratamentos prévios com anticonvulsivantes, foram submetidos a tratamento com topiramato. As doses de topiramato variaram de 50 a 100 mg ao dia, de acordo com a resposta clínica e com os efeitos colaterais relatados. Três pacientes obtiveram remissão completa, três relataram melhora parcial e o tratamento com topiramato foi ineficaz em dois pacientes. Os efeitos colaterais mais frequentemente citados foram tontura, sonolência e perda de peso. O topiramato pode ser considerado uma alternativa potencialmente eficaz para o tratamento de pacientes com neuralgia do trigêmeo.